Cases 71 - 80 of 4,739
United States v. Abel Ramirez
as 24-1578
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Abel Alejandro Ramirez
New England Teamsters Pension Fund v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
New England Teamsters Pension Fund
Defendant:
AGILON HEALTH, INC., Steven J Sell, TIMOTHY S. BENSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Ferral Rodriguez et al. v. Mayorkas et al.
as 4:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Mariselis FERRAL RODRIGUEZ, Gretel MONTALVO FROMETA, Reinel LEIVA CRUZ and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Alejandro Mayorkas and Anthony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramirez Perez v. Garland
as 24-1575
Petitioner:
REGULO RAMIREZ PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez Reyes v. Garland
as 24-1573
Petitioner:
JOSE ROLANDO RAMIREZ REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Carr v. Walker et al
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
David Aaron Carr
Defendant:
Suzanne Walker, Martin Placke, Frank Malinak and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
United States of America v. Montalvo
as 24-671
Defendant:
CARMEN M. JUSTINIANO RAMIREZ, EFRAIN HIDALGO, BRANDON JONAS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ramirez-Matias, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1460
Petitioner:
ABELINO RAMIREZ-MATIAS, CARMELA DE JESUS MELENDEZ-RIXTUN and KATERIN MABEL RAMIREZ-MELENDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Amador-Rios (Salvador)
as 24-656
Defendant:
MELVI AMADOR-RIOS, SANTOS AMADOR-RIOS, YAN CARLOS RAMIREZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
JOSE A. RODRIGUEZ, JOSE LUIS TELLO-ROBLES, NICOLE ELYSE BROOKS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
