Other Statutes Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 4,024
Ross County Board of County Commissioners v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017op45040
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: Ross County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ashland County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45012
Defendant: Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Ashland County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pike County Board of County Commissioners v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017op45039
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff: Pike County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Harlan County Fiscal Court v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017op45027
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Harlan County Fiscal Court
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Lake Charles v. Purdue Pharma L.P., et al
as 1:2019op45449
Defendant: Beverly Sackler, Allergan PLC f/k/a Actavis PLC f/k/a Allergan, Inc., Richard S. Sackler and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00429
Defendant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Plaintiff: MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Edgar et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02501
Plaintiff: Keiko Edgar, Dena Burge and UHA Health Insurance
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc., Teva Parenteral Medicines Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VICTORIA SPATARO et al v. VALUE DRUG COMPANY
as 3:2022cv06910
Petitioner: VICTORIA SPATARO, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Respondent: VALUE DRUG COMPANY
Interested Party: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
VICTORIA SPATARO et al v. VALUE DRUG COMPANY
as 2:2022cv06910
Petitioner: VICTORIA SPATARO, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Respondent: VALUE DRUG COMPANY
Interested Party: TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL INC. and AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
IN RE NAMENDA INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv06549
Plaintiff: Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund and A.F. of L.- A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan
Consolidated Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC and MSPA Claims I, LLC
Petitioner: JM Smith Corporation
Defendant: Actavis, plc, Forest Laboratories, LLC, Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH & Co. KGaA and others
Consolidated Defendant: Allergan plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?