Cases 1 - 10 of 8,261
Herrera Lopez v. Garland
as 24-3825
Petitioner:
TONY EMANU HERRERA LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
San Mateo County Sheriff's Office v. Calderon-Lopez
as 24-3810
Plaintiff:
SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Defendant:
RICARDO J. CALDERON-LOPEZ
Calderon-Lopez, et al. v. Commissioner of Social Security, et al.
as 24-3809
Plaintiff:
RICARDO J. CALDERON-LOPEZ and STARLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES, INC
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TIGRAN GUMUSHYAN and others
Calderon-Lopez, et al. v. Office of the California Secretary of State, et al.
as 24-3808
Plaintiff:
RICARDO J. CALDERON-LOPEZ, STARLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES, INC and STARLIGHT MUSIC MANAGEMENT, INC.
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE and UNKNOWN PARTY, Unknown State of California Government Personnel, Servicing the State Agencies-Franchise Tax Board
Lopez Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3799
Petitioner:
INGRID Y LOPEZ RAMIREZ, I, DANIEL E LOPEZ RAMIREZ, I and ANGEL D TELLEZ LOPEZ, I
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Lopez
as 24-3782
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STEPHEN B LOPEZ
Shannon Kay Lopez Estate v. United States of America
as 1:2024mi00050
Plaintiff:
Shannon Kay Lopez Estate
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Appointment of Receiver
Lopez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Carlos J. Lopez
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Lorry C. Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3750
Petitioner:
MARIA GLADYS RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ and ASHLY ESTEFANY ESCALANTE-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Calderon Lopez v. US
as 24-1947
Plaintiff:
RICARDO J. CALDERON LOPEZ, dba Starlight Consulting Services
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
