Cases 1 - 10 of 4,381
Guerra-Torres v. Garland
as 24-3207
Petitioner:
VILMA YOLANDA GUERRA-TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Duneske v. Roseville Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv11318
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Ann Duneske
Defendant:
Roseville Police Department, Mitch Berlin, Robert Gudenau and others
USA v. Torres-Perdomo
as 24-40351
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Zenen Torres-Perdomo
Marin v. Catano, et al.
as 24-3175
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant:
KRISTINE CATANO, in their official and personal capacity, ADELA DE LA TORRE, in their official and personal capacity, VANESSA RUIZ, in their official and personal capacity and others
Torres, et al. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Riverside
as 24-3164
Petitioner:
DOROTHY TORRES, LUIS TORRES and Dotty Torres
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Interested Party:
JAYCO, INC.
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Jason Archie Flickinger
Defendant:
Jaqueline Reyes Castillo, Robert Crisp, Pedro Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Barren v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-2896
Plaintiff:
DONALD ROBIN BARREN
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEVADA EX REL. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TOM LAWSON, P. JORDAN and others
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd.
Defendant:
Raul Torres and Stephanie Schardin Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres Vargas v. Garland
as 24-2840
Petitioner:
OMAR TORRES VARGAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
