Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Martin v. Khaylie Hazel Yearning LLC
as 3:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Andrew Martin
Defendant:
Khaylie Hazel Yearning LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
The Mississippi Bar v. Perkins
as 3:2021ad00002
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Martin D. Perkins
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
L.S. & Associates Insurance Consultants, Inc. v. Davis, et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Rupert Rudy Johnson, Ronald Lee Gill, Shane Martin and others
Plaintiff:
L.S. & Associates Insurance Consultants Inc. and L.S. & Associates Insurance Consultants, Inc.
Mills v. BankPlus et al
as 3:2019cv00196
Defendant:
Gee Gee Patridge, Jason Cowgill, Martin Murphree and others
Plaintiff:
Alysson Mills
Interested Party:
Thomas R. Hudson and Vivian C. Henley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Rowan Family Dentistry, Inc. et al v. Medical Synergy, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00116
Plaintiff:
Rowan Family Dentistry, Inc. and Martin Chiropractic, LLC
Defendant:
Medical Synergy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Martin v. Equifax, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00744
Plaintiff:
Drew Martin
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Mississippi Bar v. Louvier
as 3:2017ad00001
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Michael Martin Louvier
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Atwood et al v. Cheney et al
as 1:2016cv00105
Petitioner:
David Garland Atwood, II
Respondent:
Mike Cheney , James Jackson, Tim Nail and others
Movant:
Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Atwood et al v. Cheney et al
as 1:2016mc00001
Petitioner:
David Garland Atwood, II
Respondent:
Mike Cheney , James Jackson, Tim Nail and others
Movant:
Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
