Cases 1 - 10 of 267
Miller v. Granger et al
as 4:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
James Granger, Karinn Kim-Granger and Ty Granger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Silva v. Rylander et al
as 4:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Christopher Z Silva
Defendant:
Kate Rylander, Stacey Cooper, Linda Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Schilling v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Isabelle M Schilling
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, James Renno and Jake Bethurem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Schilling v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Isabelle M Schilling
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, James Renno and Jake Bethurem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Buckley v. Moloney Securities Co., Inc.
as 4:2023cv00879
Plaintiff:
James Buckley
Defendant:
Moloney Securities Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sanderson v. Bailey et al
as 4:2023cv01242
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Sanderson
Defendant:
Andrew Bailey and James Hudanick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prosser v. USHealth Advisors, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prosser
Defendant:
USHealth Advisors, LLC, US Health Advisors, LLC, Patrick Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
