Cases 1 - 8 of 8
AMERICAN LEGION POST #497 VETERANS, INC. v. CHELTENHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2023cv04458
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN LEGION POST #497 VETERANS, INC.
Defendant:
CHELTENHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT, MONGOMERY COUNTY PA BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA SHERIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AV2 v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 2:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
AV2
Defendant:
DENIS RICHARD MCDONOUGH, MONIQUE SMART, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
BANKS v. MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2016mc00061
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD US DEPT OF JUSTICE, DAVID HICTON, ROBERT CESSAR and others
Rascoe et al v. Cody et al
as 1:2015cv00994
Plaintiff:
Michelle C. Rascoe and Rascoe Courts, Inc.
Defendant:
Neil Cody, George Drees, Gerald S. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
DEPOLO v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF TREDYFFRIN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2014cv06689
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY J. DEPOLO
Defendant:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF TREDYFFRIN TOWNSHIP, MICHAEL C. HEABERG, KRISTEN K. MAYOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
HAZEL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012mc00291
Petitioner:
DWAYNE HAZEL
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CRIMINAL DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PRALL v. COURT OF APPEALS et al
as 2:2012cv02813
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
COURT OF APPEALS, JUDICIAL COUNCIL, THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
J. TODD CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
