Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Armbruster et al
as 2:2019cv00481
Defendant:
Bret Naggs, Mark Wogsland and Peter Armbruster
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Intervenor:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund v. Stoelting et al
as 2:2017cv01788
Defendant:
Ivor J. Evans, Scott D Rued, Chad M. Utrup and others
Plaintiff:
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Somna Therapeutics LLC v. GMI Solutions LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01780
Plaintiff:
Somna Therapeutics LLC
Defendant:
GMI Solutions LLC, Daniel Armbrust and Robert J Grabon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi v. Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00474
Defendant:
Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc, Mark A Diblasi and Peter R Armbruster
Plaintiff:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Petitioner:
Michael Easley and Armin Leuze
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Strougo v. Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Strougo and Robert Strougo
Defendant:
Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc, Mark A Diblasi and Peter R Armbruster
Petitioner:
Armin Leuze, Michael Easley and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi et al v. Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Goss and Robert Goss
Defendant:
Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc, Scott D. Rued, HCI Equity Partners LLC and others
Petitioner:
Bryan Reifsnyder, Armin Leuze and Michael Easley
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robert Strougo
Lead Plaintiff:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
