Cases 1 - 10 of 8,469
Mason v. Laz Karp Associates, LLC
as 5:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Angel Mason
Defendant:
Laz Karp Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wilson et al v. Mariner Finance North Carolina Inc.
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Cornell Wilson, Bernadette Onita Brown and Jacqueline Rena Green
Defendant:
Mariner Finance North Carolina Inc.
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Jacobs v. Signature Performance, Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Lea Jacobs
Defendant:
Signature Performance, Inc. and Southeastern Regional Medical Center d/b/a Unc Health Southeastern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. et al v. FREITAS
as 1:2024cv00496
Petitioner:
AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. and AMAZON.COM, INC.
Respondent:
CHRISTIANO FREITAS
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Ennis v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Sandre Ennis
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., Crown FDO L.L.C., Asbury Automotive North Carolina Dealership Holdings L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Recall of Bankruptcy Judge J. Craig Whitley
as 3:2024mc00090
Cause Of Action: Administrative Order
Gross v. SmartSky Networks, LLC
as 5:2023cv00731
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Pawn, U.S.A., Inc v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
as 7:2024cv00484
Petitioner:
Pawn, U.S.A., Inc
Respondent:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
HUFFMAN v. AVANTCREDIT LLC
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
SHARON CARVER HUFFMAN
Defendant:
AVANTCREDIT LLC doing business as AVANT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
