Cases 1 - 10 of 3,163
Garcia-Ruiz v. Garland
as 24-3217
Petitioner:
ALEX ADAN GARCIA-RUIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sharif v. Swindling, et al.
as 24-3153
Plaintiff:
MUHSIN SHARIF
Defendant:
ALEX SWINDLING, JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-3, Police Officers with the Eugene Police Department, ALEC SWINDLING and others
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Hunter Doster, et al v. Frank Kendall, III, et al
as 24-3404
Plaintiff:
HUNTER DOSTER, JASON ANDERSON, MCKENNA COLANTANIO and others
Defendant:
HON. FRANK KENDALL, III, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force, LT. GENERAL ROBERT I. MILLER, In his official capacity as Surgeon General of the Air Force, LT. GENERAL BRIAN S. ROBINSON, In his official capacity as Commander, Air Education and Training Command and others
Langworthy v. Clallam County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2976
Plaintiff:
GENEVA LANGWORTHY
Defendant:
CLALLAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ALEX SCHODOWSKI, Clallam County District Court Judge and Pro Tem Judge, DAVE NEUPERT, Clallam County District Court Judge and Pro Tem Judge and others
Alex LovejoyIn re: Alex Lovejoy
as 24-1869
Petitioner:
In re: ALEX LOVEJOY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Liu et al v. EB5 Global SF, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Nan Liu, Hao Liu, Guangxiang Xu and others
Defendant:
EB5 Global SF, LLC, MiMA Real Estate Partners I, LLC, Renoir HM, LLC and others
United States of America v. Rodriguez Tapia
as 24-1245
Defendant:
ALEX SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ TAPIA, NERLYN LUIS BAQUE VILLAFUERTE, JUAN CARLOS LOPEZ LASA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WILLENBORG v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00713
Petitioner:
ALEX WILLENBORG
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
