Cases 1 - 10 of 1,088
Moore v. Stolsig, et al.
as 24-2704
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MOE MOORE
Defendant:
MELISSA STOLSIG, JONNA DONLAP, ALICIA NIX and others
Santamaria-Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2700
Petitioner:
MARTA ALICIA SANTAMARIA-RAMIREZ and ERICK ADOLFO LEIVA-SANTAMARIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
URBAS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00668
Petitioner:
ALICIA M. URBAS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Choc-Ico, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2315
Petitioner:
ALICIA CHOC-ICO and SILVIA COC-CHOC
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Environmental Protection Information Center, et al. v. van Atta, et al.
as 24-2210
Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER and FRIENDS OF THE SHASTA RIVER
Defendant:
ALICIA VAN ATTA, JIM SIMONDET and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Greg Hale, et al v. ARcare, Inc
as 24-1726
Plaintiff:
Greg Hale, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Melissa Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Alicia Gilmore, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant:
ARcare, Inc, originally named as ARcare
Cohen v. Tepper et al
as 2:2024cv02460
Plaintiff:
Martin Leonard Cohen
Defendant:
Stanley H. Tepper, Alan R. Tepper, Walter A. Koprowski and others
Interested Party:
US Attorney for the E. District of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Clark v. Haynes International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
Haynes International, Inc., Robert H. Getz, Michael L. Shor and others
Coffman v. Haynes International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Haynes International, Inc., Robert H. Getz, Michael L. Shor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
