Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Center for Biological Diversi, et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 21-10780
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SCOTT DE LA VEGA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Director of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CALUSA WATERKEEPER, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE, INC.
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. ANDREW WHEELER et al
as 1:2021cv00119
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ANDREW KELLY, ANDREW WHEELER and others
Plaintiff:
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, SIERRA CLUB, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Petitioner:
FLORIDA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS, INCORPORATED (AFCD)
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Sierra Club et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 8:2020cv00287
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Todd T. Semonite, Andrew D Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rametta and Sierra Club
Intervenor Defendant:
Pasco County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2019cv14199
Defendant:
Deputy Directory Margaret Everson, Secretary David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Plaintiff:
Calusa Waterkeeper, Center for Biological Diversity and Waterkeeper Alliance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
USA v. Andrew Kelly
as 12-30936
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREW KELLY
USA v. Andrew Kelly
as 10-30158
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREW KELLY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
