Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Williams Goyens-Bell Eberwein v. Denney, et al.
as 24-4892
Defendant:
N. BELL, VICTOR PERNIA, also known as Tenderloin Housing Clinic, KAREN GORMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHALEDEEANNKA DEBORAH ANN WILLIAMS GOYENS-BELL EBERWEIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Williams Goyens-Bell Eberwein v. Denney, et al.
as 24-3561
Defendant:
VICTOR PERNIA, CRAIG S. DENNEY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, N. BELL and others
Plaintiff:
CHALEDEEANNKA DEBORAH ANN WILLIAMS GOYENS-BELL EBERWEIN
USA v. Veleta Williams
as 23-11272
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
VELETA ANN WILLIAMS
USA v. Veleta Williams
as 23-10036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
VELETA ANN WILLIAMS
USA v. Veleta Williams
as 22-14172
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
VELETA ANN WILLIAMS
ISOM v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2022cv02796
Plaintiff:
TYESHA N. ISOM
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, JOHN FALCICCHIO, SONIA SOTOMAYOR and others
Williams v. FFCCU et al
as 1:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
Secunda Williams and Secunda Ann Williams
Defendant:
FFCCU, Community Shelter Norma-Her, Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Williams v. PNC Bank NA
as 1:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
Mari Anne Williams
Respondent:
PNC Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
O'Sullivan et al v. Deutsche Bank AG et al
as 1:2017cv08709
Plaintiff:
Sonja Ruhren, Andrew Pearcy, Jonathan F. Kuniholm and others
Defendant:
Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, BNP Paribas S.A., Credit Suisse AG and others
Interested Party:
United States Attorney's Office (S.D.N.Y.) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
New York County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
