Cases 1 - 10 of 3,356
Carroll Independent School District v. United States Department of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Carroll Independent School District
Defendant:
United States Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Education, Catherine E. Lhamon, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the United States Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Sebastian Nowak v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1877
Petitioner:
SEBASTIAN NOWAK
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Sifuentes Matallana v. Garland
as 24-9536
Petitioner:
JULIO SIFUENTES MATALLANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Emmanuel Tiah v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-2010
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Dwah Tiah
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Krystyna Sawicka v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1795
Petitioner:
KRYSTYNA SAWICKA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
TikTok Inc., et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1113
Petitioner:
TikTok Inc. and ByteDance Ltd.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States,
Manasse Abbanga Rimtobaye v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1773
Petitioner:
MANASSE ABBANGA RIMTOBAYE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Juan Leon Mejia v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1948
Petitioner:
Juan Rufino Leon Mejia
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Maria Weidenburner v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1903
Petitioner:
Maria Isabel Weidenburner
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Diego Morales-Ortega v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1910
Petitioner:
Diego Herlindo Morales-Ortega
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
