Cases 1 - 10 of 30
DM Trans, LLC v. Lindsey Scott, et al
as 21-3101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DM TRANS, LLC, doing business as Arrive Logistics
Defendant / Appellee:
LINDSEY B. SCOTT, MATTHEW J. DUFFY, SCOTT C. MAYER and others
DM Trans, LLC v. Scott et al
as 1:2021cv03634
Plaintiff:
DM Trans, LLC doing business as Arrive Logistics
Defendant:
Lindsey B. Scott, Matthew J. Duffy, Scott C. Mayer and others
DM Trans, LLC v. Scott et al
as 1:2021cv00505
Defendant:
Lindsey B. Scott, Matthew J. Duffy, Scott C. Mayer and others
Plaintiff:
DM Trans, LLC doing business as Arrive Logistics
Klein v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03561
Defendant:
Paul Gabos, Daylight Beta Parent Corp., Gavin Southwell and others
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Hoover v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06145
Defendant:
Paul G. Gabos, Gavin Southwell, Paul E. Avery and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Hoover
Glaze v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06118
Defendant:
Paul G. Gabos, Gavin Southwell, Paul E. Avery and others
Plaintiff:
Orville Bernard Glaze, Jr.
Levin v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03522
Defendant:
Paul Gabos, Gavin Southwell, Paul E. Avery and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel N. Levin
Shine v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05976
Defendant:
Paul Gabos, Gavin Southwell, Benefytt Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Shine
Plumley v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01017
Defendant:
Paul Gabos, Peggy B. Scott, Gavin Southwell and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Schlosser v. Kwak
as 20-2337
Defendant / Appellee:
David Carlucci, Prosecuting Atty, Individual Capacity, Doe, Director CSSD Adult Probation, Official Capacity, Doe, Dpty Chief Public Defender, Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeffrey Schlosser
Defendant:
Chevier, Ms., Individual, Official Capacity, William Krahe, LCSW, Maura Fisher, APRN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
