Cases 1 - 10 of 16
EWIDEH et al v. KEYSTONE ADVANCED REMODELING, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03032
Plaintiff:
OMAR EWIDEH and NIVERTITI GEAITH
Defendant:
KEYSTONE ADVANCED REMODELING, LLC, BEACON BUILDING PRODUCTS, FREDERICK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
KINGFLY SPIRITS et al v. RAGGHIANTI et al
as 2:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
KINGFLY SPIRITS formerly doing business as PORT OF PITTSBURGH DISTILLERY, LLC, MARK WILLSON and EBBREZZA, INC.
Defendant:
BLAKE RAGGHIANTI, DAVID S. KLETT, JUSTINA TUSHAK and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
KINGFLY SPIRITS et al v. RAGGHIANTI et al
as 1:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
KINGFLY SPIRITS formerly doing business as PORT OF PITTSBURGH DISTILLERY, LLC, MARK WILLSON and EBBREZZA, INC.
Defendant:
BLAKE RAGGHIANTI, DAVID S. KLETT, JUSTINA TUSHAK and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BLAKE v. METROMILE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
MARK BLAKE
Defendant:
METROMILE, INC., DAN PRESTON, COLIN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
JULIAN et al v. PHILIP
as 2:2021mc00087
Respondent:
CPA SUNIL PHILIP
Petitioner:
D.D.S. JON JULIAN, D.D.S. BLAKE JULIAN and GREENVILLE DENTAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, P.A.
CICCOTELLI v. INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05296
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC., SCOTT F. SCHAEFFER, WILLIAM C DUNKELBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BLAKE v. MYLAN N.V. et al
as 2:2015cv01131
Plaintiff:
MARSHA BLAKE
Defendant:
MYLAN N.V. , HEATHER BRESCH , WENDY CAMERON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
