Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BYRD ESTATE v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01063
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY BYRD ESTATE
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE CORPORATION, WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY AS TRUSTEE FOR A & D MORTGAGE TRUST 2023-NQM4 and OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WATERMAN v. FIRST HORIZON CORP. et al
as 2:2022cv01669
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
FIRST HORIZON CORP., HARRY V BARTON JR., KENNETH A BURDICK and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
BYRD v. MANNING
as 2:2017cv01538
Plaintiff:
HOUSTON BYRD, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. MANNING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BYRD v. MANNING
as 2:2017cv04968
Plaintiff:
HOUSTON BYRD, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. MANNING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BYRD
as 1:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DEBORAH BYRD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
MEYER-CHATFIELD CORP. v. WINICK et al
as 2:2014cv02790
Plaintiff:
MEYER-CHATFIELD CORP.
Defendant:
ARNOLD WINICK , DAVID SCHWARTZ, JOSEPH BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BYRD v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2012mc00274
Plaintiff:
SANDRA BYRD
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and CAPITAL ONE BANK USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BYRD et al v. AARON'S, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL BYRD and BRIAN BYRD
Defendant:
AARON'S, INC., ASPEN WAY ENTERPRISES, INC. doing business as AARON'S SALES AND LEASING, A FRANCHISEE OF AARON'S INC., DESIGNERWARE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
BYRD v. ACB AMERICAN, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00059
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY BYRD and KIMBERLY BYRD
Defendant:
ACB AMERICAN, INC., JOHN DOES and JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
