Cases 1 - 10 of 950
SHEWMAKER et al v. YARDI SYSTEMS INC et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Defendant:
BALACIANO GROUP, YARDI SYSTEMS INC, ALCO MANAGEMENT INC and others
Plaintiff:
MADISON SHEWMAKER and JAMAAR FAISON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Rodgers et al
as 2:2024cv02378
Plaintiff:
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Donald Wray Rodgers and Three Bridges Trading Fund, LLC
Trucking Association of New York v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
as 1:2024cv04111
Plaintiff:
Trucking Association of New York
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority and Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14501 Preemption (federal authority of intrastate transportation)
Taie, et al. v. Ten Bridges LLC, et al.
as 24-3320
Plaintiff:
MARY TAIE, MOYRA COOP and WILLIAM GROVES
Defendant:
TEN BRIDGES LLC and DEMIAN HEALD
Covered Bridge Outdoor Construction Corporation v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03965
Plaintiff:
Covered Bridge Outdoor Construction Corporation
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Taie, et al. v. Ten Bridges LLC, et al.
as 24-3243
Plaintiff:
MARY TAIE, an individual, MOYRA COOP, an individual and WILLIAM GROVES, an individual, on behalf of themselves and as representatives of similarly situated persons
Defendant:
TEN BRIDGES LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company and DEMIAN HEALD, an individual; and the marital community comprised of Demian Heald and Doe Heald
County Of Rockland et al v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority et al
as 7:2024cv02285
Plaintiff:
County Of Rockland, County Executive Edwin J Day and Legislature Of The County Of Rockland
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority and Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
