Cases 1 - 6 of 6
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-2227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER, a/k/a Dwayne Baker
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN T. GILMORE, Warden, A. HICKS, Assistant Warden, K. H. TUCKER, Institutional Ombudsman and others
Defendant:
COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region, MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region and others
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6009
Defendant / Appellee:
STETVEN A. JONES, Captain, SERGEANT T. H. WILLIAMSON, JANE DOE, Medical Contractor Mediko employee and others
Defendant:
MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region, COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER
Robert Dougherty v. Dana Lawhorne
as 19-7835
Defendant / Appellee:
T. L. CRICKEMBERGER, Hearing Officer (of record), Coffewood Correctional Center, M.S. KIMBERLY TUCKER, Grievance Officer, Coffewood Correctional Center, WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator Grievances, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. DOUGHERTY
Robert Dougherty v. Dana Lawhorne
as 19-6964
Defendant / Appellee:
T. L. CRICKEMBERGER, Hearing Officer (of record), Coffewood Correctional Center, M.S. KIMBERLY TUCKER, Grievance Officer, Coffewood Correctional Center, WENDY S. HOBBS, Regional Administrator Grievances, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. DOUGHERTY
C & L Ward Bros., Co. v. Outsource Solutions, Inc., et al
as 13-1435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
C & L WARD BROS., CO.
Defendant - Appellee:
OUTSOURCE SOLUTIONS, INC., YOURSOURCE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., TODD LANCASTER and others
C & L Ward Bros., Co. v. Outsource Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv14773
Defendant:
Outsource Solutions, Inc., YourSource Management Group, Inc., Todd Lancaster and others
Plaintiff:
C & L Ward Bros., Co.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.