Cases 1 - 10 of 12
In re: Caleb McGillvary
as 24-1129
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, BRUCE DAVIS, Warden and CHRISTINE P. O'HEARN
McGillvary v. Dorsey
as 23-4041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant / Appellee:
LAMONT DORSEY
MCGILLVARY v. SCUTARI et al
as 1:2023cv22605
Plaintiff:
CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant:
NICHOLAS SCUTARI, NETFLIX, THEODORE ROMANKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Caleb McGillvaryIn re: Caleb McGillvary
as 23-3055
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and CHRISTINE P. O'HEARN
McGillvary v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Tacoma
as 23-3568
Petitioner:
CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, TACOMA
Not Classified By Court:
LAMONT DORSEY
Caleb McGillvaryIn re: Caleb McGillvary
as 23-2820
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, BRUCE DAVIS and CHRISTINE P. O'HEARN
Caleb McGillvaryIn re: Caleb McGillvary
as 23-2660
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, BRUCE DAVIS and CHRISTINE P. O'HEARN
Caleb McGillvaryIn re: Caleb McGillvary
as 23-2188
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, BRUCE DAVIS, Warden and MICHAEL E. FARBIARZ
n v. Attorney General New Jersey, et alIn re: n v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 23-1773
Petitioner:
In re: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Caleb L. McGillvary et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Caleb L. McGillvary
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Bunim Murray Productions, Jimmy Kimmel Live and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
