Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Carlos Collins v. Karen Rhodes, et al
as 20-1025
Defendant / Appellee:
DORSEY VIVEN and KAREN RHODES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS COLLINS
United States of America v. Flowers (Lopez)
as 18-2349
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Demetrius Flowers, AKA Mojo, Joseph Smith, AKA Joe Lite, Frank O'Bryant, AKA Frank White and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Carlos Andrew Lopez, AKA Los
United States of America v. Flowers (Wilson)
as 17-2826
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Demetrius Flowers, AKA Mojo, Frank O'Byrant, AKA Frank White, Quinzell Frazier, AKA Q Black, AKA Blizzy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert Wilson, Sr. and Luis Cruz, AKA Manny
United States of America v. Flowers (Cruz)
as 17-2592
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Demetrius Flowers, AKA Mojo, Frank O'Byrant, AKA Frank White, Quinzell Frazier, AKA Q Black, AKA Blizzy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Luis Cruz, AKA Manny
United States of America v. Flowers (Padilla)
as 17-1639
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Demetrius Flowers, AKA Mojo, Frank O'Byrant, AKA Frank White, Quinzell Frazier, AKA Q Black, AKA Blizzy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Eladio Padilla, AKA Nino
United States of America v. Flowers (Smith)
as 17-1577
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Demetrius Flowers, AKA Mojo, Frank O'Byrant, AKA Frank White, Quinzell Frazier, AKA Q Black, AKA Blizzy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Joseph Smith, AKA Joe Lite and Eladio Padilla, AKA Nino
Hylkema v. Midland Credit Management Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01652
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Hylkema
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management Inc , Carlos Collins and Jane Doe Collins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Lawrence v. Warren, City of et al
as 2:2011cv13114
Plaintiff:
Teddy Lawrence
Defendant:
Warren, City of, Warren Police Department, Carlos Collins and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
