Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Tucson Airport Authority v. Goforth et al
as 4:2012mc00014
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Tucson Foundry & Manufacturing Incorporated, Arizona Board of Regents and others
Petitioner:
Tucson Airport Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
State of Arizona, et al v. Raytheon Company, et al
as 12-15691
Intervenor:
RAYTHEON CO. and PIMA COUNTY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PIMA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, DURODYNE, INC., GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Intervenor Plaintiff:
CITY OF TUCSON
State of Arizona, et al v. Ashton Company Incorporated Co, et al
as 12-15691
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF TUCSON
Intervenor - Appellant:
RAYTHEON COMPANY and PIMA COUNTY
Defendant - Appellee:
ASHTON COMPANY INCORPORATED CONTRACTORS AND ENGINEERS, BALDOR ELECTRIC COMPANY, DON MACKEY OLDSMOBILE CADILLAC, INC. and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, TOMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Arizona, State of v. Ashton Company Incorporated Contractors and Engineers et al
as 4:2010cv00634
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of
Defendant:
Ashton Company Incorporated Contractors and Engineers, Baldor Electric Company, Don Mackey Oldsmobile - Cadillac Incorporated and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Tucson, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
ARNOLD v. BATTERY STEAMSHIP CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv37873
Plaintiff:
ORDE E. ARNOLD
Defendant:
BATTERY STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, ISBRANDTSEN TANKERS, JAS. W. ELWELL COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED , TEXACO INC , CHARLES KURZ AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND , KEENE CORP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
