Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Diamond et al v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC
as 2:2024cv01701
Plaintiff:
H. JOSHUA DIAMOND, ROBERT P. ELSON and LORI ZINN
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC doing business as XFINITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Diamond et al v. Comcast Cable Communications LLC
as 1:2024cv20064
Plaintiff:
H. Joshua Diamond, Robert P. Elson and Lori Zinn
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC and Comcast Cable Communications LLC doing business as Xfinity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Carey v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as FLS/0:24-CV-60008
Plaintiff:
Carey and Jessica Carey
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc, Citrix Systems, Inc. and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC doing business as Xfinity
Hammond et al v. Citrix Systems, Inc. et al
as FLS/0:23-CV-62409
Plaintiff:
Hammond, Brittany Hammond and Tamia Charles
Defendant:
Citrix Systems, Inc, Citrix Systems, Inc. and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC doing business as Xfinity
KEUNG v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
as PAE/2:23-CV-05110
Plaintiff:
KEUNG and JACQUELINE KEUNG
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC doing business as XFINITY
Graham v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv02377
Plaintiff:
Chester C. Graham
Defendant:
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC doing business as Xfinity, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, Comcast of Minnesota/Wisconsin, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
