Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Bagwell v. Cox Commnications, Inc
as 8:2016cv00406
Plaintiff:
April Bagwell
Defendant:
Cox Commnications, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Henderson v. Allen et al
as 4:2015cv03040
Defendant:
Hon. Kristine Cook Graham, et. al., Cindy Adams, Marty Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Bishop et al
as 4:2015cv03041
Defendant:
8th Circuit, Marty Allen, DW. Marty Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems et al
as 4:2007cv03264
Plaintiff:
Phillip Cox
Relator Plaintiff:
Phillip Cox
Defendant:
General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, General Dynamics Aerospace, General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
John Doe and Jane Doe 1 through 20 et al v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2009cv00456
Defendant:
Millard Gustafson, State of Nebraska, Nebraska State Patrol and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe 1 through 20, John Doe and Jane Doe A through K and John Doe and Jane Doe 1 through 36
Interested Party:
Senator Pete Pirsch, Dave Cookson, John Freudenberg and others
Intervenor:
John Doe 21-23
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Qwest Corporation v. Cox Nebraska Telcom, et al
as 4:2008cv03035
Plaintiff:
Qwest Corporation
Defendant:
Cox Nebraska Telcom, Nebraska Public Service Commission, Gerald L. Vap and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cox v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, et al
as 4:2007cv03168
Plaintiff:
Phillip Cox
Defendant:
Defense Contract Managment Agency, Rebecca N. Seeger, General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
