Cases 1 - 10 of 3,772
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hart v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 2:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Carol Hart
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Stanfill-EL v. Bay, et al.
as 24-3112
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE STANFILL-EL
Defendant:
MELISSA BAY, VINCE DIMONE, CAROL ROANNE and others
Glover v. Avanos Medical, Inc.
as 24-3102
Plaintiff:
BERENICE CAROL GLOVER, Personal Representative for the Estate of Frank Wayne Glover
Defendant:
AVANOS MEDICAL, INC., a Delaware Corporation; doing business as Halyard Health, Inc.
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Dinsmore v. Cohbar, Inc et al
as 6:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
Jacob R Dinsmore
Defendant:
Cohbar, Inc, David Greenwood, Albion Fitzgerald and others
Carol Givens v. John Vavra, et al
as 24-3381
Plaintiff:
CAROL L. GIVENS
Defendant:
JUDGE JOHN A. VAVRA, MAYOR ROBERT NEWHART, SR., BELMONT COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Up in Smoke Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Up in Smoke Inc doing business as Up in Smoke doing business as Up in Smoke Private Club Lewisville, Daniel L. Schmitt doing business as Up in Smoke doing business as Up in Smoke Private Club Lewisville, Carol A. Schmitt doing business as Up in Smoke doing business as Up in Smoke Private Club Lewisville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Joan Lipin v. Arthur Wisehart, et al
as 24-3365
Plaintiff:
JOAN CAROL LIPIN
Defendant:
ARTHUR DODSON WISEHART and MARK APELMAN
Joan Lipin v. Arthur Wisehart, et al
as 24-3366
Plaintiff:
JOAN CAROL LIPIN
Defendant:
ARTHUR DODSON WISEHART and MARK APELMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
