Cases 1 - 10 of 132
UpHealth Holdings, Inc. v. Glocal Healthcare Systems Private Limited et al
as 1:2024cv03778
Petitioner:
UpHealth Holdings, Inc.
Respondent:
Glocal Healthcare Systems Private Limited, Dr. Syed Sabahat Azim, Richa Sana Azim and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Chowdhury v. Garland
as 24-1170
Petitioner:
JAHANGIR CHOWDHURY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chepilko v. Henry
as 24-1059
Petitioner:
SERGEI CHEPILKO
Defendant:
Police Officer SCOTT HENRY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Sergeant TARAKUR CHOWDHURY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Faiz M. Chowdhury et al
as 8:2023cv01741
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Faiz M. Chowdhury, DTI Holdings, Inc. and Quantum Age Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Spirit Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Shield Pharmaceuticals, Corp. et al
as 2:2023cv06841
Plaintiff:
Spirit Pharmaceuticals LLC
Defendant:
Shield Pharmaceuticals, Corp., John Brown, Mohammed Chowdhury and others
WU et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LEWIS WU, KATHERINE WU, NATHAN BRUNO and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Chowdhury
as 23-6746
Defendant / Appellant:
NAYEEM AHMED CHOWDHURY and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID MENDEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
