Cases 1 - 6 of 6
SATNAM DISTRIBUTORS LLC v. COMMONWEALTH-ALTADIS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06660
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH-ALTADIS, INC., COMMONWEALTH BRANDS, INC., HAROLD LEVINSON ASSOCIATES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SATNAM DISTRIBUTORS LLC and SATNAM DISTRIBUTORS LLC doing business as LION & BEAR DISTRIBUTORS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rohit Prakash v. Altadis U.S.A., Inc., et al
as 12-3492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROHIT PRAKASH
Defendant - Appellee:
ALTADIS U.S.A., INC., ALTADIS HOLDINGS U.S.A., INC., CUBAN CIGAR BRANDS NV and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Conway et al
as 3:2008cv00571
Plaintiff:
VIBO Corporation, Inc., VIBO Corporation, Inc. and VIBO Corporation, Inc.
Defendant:
Jack Conway, Troy King, Talis J. Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beiersdorf Inc et al v International Outsourcing Services LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00888
Plaintiff:
Beiersdorf Inc, Beiersdorf Inc, Beiersdorf Inc and others
Defendant:
International Outsourcing Services LLC, Thomas C Balsiger, Bruce A Furr and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
