Other Statutes Cases
Apt. Assn of Greater L.A. v. City of Los Angeles, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-56251
Defendant / Appellee: DOES, 1 through 25, inclusive, ERIC GARCETTI, in his official capacity as Mayor of Los Angeles, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: APARTMENT ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, INC., DBA Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: ALLIANCE OF CALIFORNIANS FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT ACTION and STRATEGIC ACTIONS FOR A JUST ECONOMY
Amicus Curiae: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF NONPROFIT HOUSING, UNITED TEACHERS LOS ANGELES, UCLA LUSKIN INSTITUTE ON INEQUALITY AND DEMOCRACY, UCLA CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD KNOWLEDGE, PROFESSOR ANANYA ROY AND PROFESSOR PAUL ONG and others
COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01974
Plaintiff: COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, CHARLES P. RETTIG, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant: DTTM OPERATIONS MANAGING MEMBER CORP., DONALD J. TRUMP REVOCABLE TRUST, DJT HOLDINGS LLC and others
Petitioner: DUANE MORLEY COX
Amicus Curiae: THOMAS J. SPULAK, GERALDINE R. GENNET, IRVIN B. NATHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
The Democratic Party of Wisconsin et al v. Vos, Robin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00142
Plaintiff: Colleen Robson, Denis Hostettler, Jr., Lindsay Dorff and others
Defendant: John Nygren, Joan Ballweg, Roger Roth and others
Amicus Curiae: Amici Curiae Constitutional Law Scholars
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of California, et al v. March for Life, et al
as 19-15150
Plaintiff / Appellee: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: MARCH FOR LIFE EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND
Amicus Curiae: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY and others
State of California, et al v. USHHS, et al
as 19-15118
Plaintiff / Appellee: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE
Amicus Curiae: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY, TEXAS, , ALABAMA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, IDAHO, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, UTAH, and WEST VIRGINIA and others
State of California, et al v. The Little Sisters of the Poor, et al
as 19-15072
Plaintiff / Appellee: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE
Amicus Curiae: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY and others
County of Santa Clara v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 3:2017cv00574
Plaintiff: County of Santa Clara
Defendant: Donald J. Trump, Dana J. Boente, Mark Sandy and others
Amicus Curiae: LifeMoves, City of Salinas, Administrative Law Professors and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Young Women's Christian Association of Silicon Valley
Intervenor Defendant: Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?