Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00209
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Swanson v. National Credit Services Inc
as 2:2019cv01504
Plaintiff:
Rosalyne Swanson
Defendant:
National Credit Services, Inc. and National Credit Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Archer v. Associated Credit Service Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Charles Archer
Defendant:
Associated Credit Service Inc, David Solberg, Jane Doe Solberg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fuqua v. Associated Credit Service Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00324
Plaintiff:
Jessica Fuqua
Defendant:
Associated Credit Service Inc, Paul J Wasson and Jane Doe Wasson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sullivan v. Financial Credit Service, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00773
Plaintiff:
Jill Sullivan
Defendant:
Financial Credit Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brandt v. Columbia Credit Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00703
Plaintiff:
Russell Brandt
Defendant:
Columbia Credit Services, Inc., Wales & Woehler, Inc., P.S., Jason L. Woehler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seed v. Associated Credit Services Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Bradley Seed
Defendant:
Associated Credit Service Inc, Paul J Wasson and Jane Doe Wasson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cottle et al v. Associated Credit Service Inc
as 2:2016cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jason Cottle , Saima Miller and James Miller
Defendant:
Associated Credit Service Inc
Counter_claimant:
Associated Credit Service Inc
Counter_defendant:
Jason Cottle , James Miller and Saima Miller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
