Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 55
United States of America v. Rivera
as 24-2074
Defendant: JORGE RIVERA, GEDEON TORRES, PHILLIP KLOSKOWSKI and others
: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
O'Dell v. Dice Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05774
Plaintiff: Ryan O'Dell
Defendant: Dice Therapeutics, Inc., Jim Scopa, Jake Simson and others
Scott v. DICE Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00730
Plaintiff: Robert Scott
Defendant: DICE Therapeutics, Inc., Jim Scopa, Jake Simson and others
Kent v. DICE Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00728
Plaintiff: Michael Kent
Defendant: DICE Therapeutics, Inc., Jim Scopa, Jake Simson and others
Wolfson v. DICE Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03354
Plaintiff: Barbara Wolfson
Defendant: DICE Therapeutics, Inc., Jim Scopa, Jake Simson and others
Bushansky v. DICE Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03353
Plaintiff: Stephen Bushansky
Defendant: DICE Therapeutics, Inc., Jim Scopa, Jake Simson and others
United States of America v. Burgess (Curtis)
as 22-735
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Tyshawn Burgess, AKA Ty, AKA Ty Black, Lloyd Gordon, AKA LG, Larry Bayer, AKA L and others
Defendant / Appellant: Maurice Curtis, AKA Mo
United States of America v. Burgess (Sumpter)
as 22-473
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Tyshawn Burgess, AKA Ty, AKA Ty Black, Lloyd Gordon, AKA LG, Larry Bayer, AKA L and others
Defendant / Appellant: Tyrell Sumpter, AKA Rell, AKA Ruger
Horn v. Medical Marijuana, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-349
Plaintiff: Cindy Harp-Horn
Plaintiff / Appellant: Douglas J. Horn
Defendant / Appellee: Medical Marijuana, Inc., Dixie Holdings, LLC, AKA Dixie Elixirs and Red Dice Holdings, LLC
Defendant: Dixie Botanicals
Gernard D. ChestnutIn re: Gernard D. Chestnut
as 21-14488
Petitioner: In re: GERNARD CHESTNUT
Respondent: SANTA ROSA CI WARDEN, J. NEEL, Lieutenant, HUGHES, Lieutenant and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?