Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Endo International plc v. USDC-CASF
as 20-73725
Not Classified By Court:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, In re: ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC and THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney Dennis J. Herrera
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Petitioner:
ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries v. USDC-CASF
as 20-73430
Not Classified By Court:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney Dennis J. Herrera and In re: TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Petitioner:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Allison Rice v. City & County of San Francisco, et al
as 20-15087
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS J. HERRERA, San Francisco City Attorney, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, MARIA BENJAMIN, Director of Homeownership & Below Market Rate Programs San Francisco Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLISON BARTON RICE, an individual
City and County of San Francisco et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv07591
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and The People of the State of California acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney Dennis J. Herrera
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff:
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, et al v. Debra Bowen, et al
as 11-17884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA, Yes on 8, Sponsored by National Organization for Marriage, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA PAC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA BOWEN, ROSS JOHNSON, CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE and others
ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, et al v. Debra Bowen, et al
as 11-17884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA, Yes on 8, Sponsored by National Organization for Marriage, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA PAC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA BOWEN, ROSS JOHNSON, CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Amicus Curiae:
CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER
ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al
as 2:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, National Organization for Marriage California - Yes on 8, Sponsored by National Organization for Marriage, John Doe #1 and others
Defendant:
Debra Bowen, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Dean C. Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation (MDL 1566)
as 2:2003cv01431
Defendant:
RRI Energy Services, Inc., AEP Energy Services, Inc., American Electric Power Company, Inc. and others
In Re:
Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Carthage College and Briggs and Stratton Corporation
Plaintiff:
A.L. Gilbert Company, Abelman Art Glass, Auila, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
