Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BYRD et al v. CHUPP'S COUNTRY CUPBOARD et al
as PAW/2:16-cv-00316
Plaintiff:
DEBRA BYRD and GERRY BYRD
Defendant:
CHUPP'S COUNTRY CUPBOARD , HENRY L. CHUPP , NATIONAL FUEL GAS CORPORATION and others
Japanese Village, LLC v. FTA, et al
as 14-56837
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAPANESE VILLAGE, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, CAROLYN FLOWERS, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Federal Transit Administration, PETER M. ROGOFF, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Federal Transit Administration and others
Betty Goldberg, et al v. Arthur P Arns, et al
as 2:1994cv03834
Counter Claimant:
Arthur P Arns, Cynthia Arns, California Department of Transporation and others
Cross Defendant:
Arthur P Arns and Donald J George
Unknown:
Stephanie Sontag Nance, Stephanie Sontag Nance, Colin L Pearce and others
Defendant:
Arthur P Arns, Cynthia Arns, Does and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
California Department of Transporation, Al Goldberg, Betty Goldberg and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
California Department of Transporation, Goss-Jewett Co Inc, Goss-Jewett Co Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
California Department of Transporation
Counter Defendant:
Al Goldberg, Betty Goldberg, Goss-Jewett & Company Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Al Goldberg and Betty Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Harlan Jacobsen v. Paul Trombino, et al
as 13-2576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harold L. Jacobsen, doing business as Iowa Casino Fun, doing business as Diabetes Cure 101, doing business as Country Singles, doing business as 18 Wheel Singles, doing business as Add 15 Years
Defendant - Appellee:
Paul Trombino, III, Director of the Iowa Department of Transporation, individually and in the capacity, Steven McMenamin, Rest Area Administrator, Robert Younie, Director of Maintenance, Individually and in that capacity and others
Coalition for Sustainable 520 et al v. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
as 2:2011cv01461
Defendant:
US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Daniel M Mathis and others
Plaintiff:
Coalition for Sustainable 520
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Honolulutraffic.com et al v. Federal Transit Administration et al
as 1:2011cv00307
Plaintiff:
Honolulutraffic.com , Cliff Slater , Benjamin J. Cayetano and others
Defendant:
Federal Transit Administration , Leslie Rogers , Peter M. Rogoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Campbell et al v. Jilik et al
as 2:2009cv01305
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A Campbell, Seattle Citizens Against the Tunnel, Harvey Friedman and others
Defendant:
Peter Jilik, Federal Highway Administration and Washington State Department of Transporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Abex Aerospace Div, et al
as 2:2000cv12471
Defendant:
ABM CMS, Inc., Abex Aerospace Division, Air Conditioning Co. Inc. and others
Mitutoyo American Corporation:
MTI Engineering Corporation
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
JM Martinac Shipbuilding Corpo v. State of Washington, et al
as 08-35754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JM MARTINAC SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, by and through its Department of Transporation, DOUGLAS B. MACDONALD, Secretary of Transportation, in his individual capacity, W. MICHAEL ANDERSON, Acting Assistant Secretary and Executive Director, WSF, in his individual capacity and others
Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Inc. et al v. Peters et al
as 1:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Inc., Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Inc., Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mary E. Peters, The Federal Highway Administration and New York State Department of Transporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
