Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Flores Limon, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2584
Plaintiff: BEATRIZ FLORES LIMON and JOSE ANTONIO HERNANDEZ REYES
Defendant: LOREN K. MILLER, Director, Nebraska Service Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity as well as his successors and assigns, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity as well as his successors and assigns, UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in her official capacity as well as her successor and assigns and others
V. U. C., et al v. USCIS, et al
as 21-1778
Plaintiff / Appellant: V. U. C. and P. C. C.
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in official capacity as Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, TRACY RENAUD, in her official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and others
Benjamin Slappendel, et al v. Lorne Miller, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2551
Plaintiff / Appellant: Benjamin Slappendel and Katherine Amerson
Defendant / Appellee: Lorne Miller, Associate Director, Nebraska Service Center, John/Jane Doe, Adjudicator, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General and others
Adrian Mojica-Morales v. Acting Secretary, United State, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-10835
Defendant / Appellee: ACTING DIRECTOR, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ACTING MIAMI FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ACTING SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ADRIAN MOJICA-MORALES
Sotelo et al v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 0:2019cv62620
Plaintiff: David Eduardo Sotelo Garcia and Carmen Emilia Sotelo
Defendant: Acting District Director, District 9, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Field Office Director, Oakland Park Field Office, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Chung Hsiao v. Mark Hazuda, et al
as 15-55676
Defendant / Appellee: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, LORI SCIALABBA, Acting Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHUNG HOU HSIAO
Philippe v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2017cv00959
Plaintiff: Rosena Philippe
Defendant: Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Associate Director, Nebraska Service Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Mabruk v. Secretary Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2010cv00553
Plaintiff: Ali Salim Mabruk
Defendant: Secretary Department of Homeland Security, Director of Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director, Nebraska Service Center, Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Salman v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2009cv01305
Plaintiff: Salman Salman
Defendant: Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Director, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director, Nebraska Service Center, Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Type: Other Statutes None
Bachir Debba v. Gerard Heinauer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1540
Petitioner - Appellant: Bachir Debba
Respondent - Appellee: Gerard Heinauer, Director, Nebraska Service Center, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States and Alejandro Mayorkas, Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?