Cases 1 - 9 of 9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEAVER
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DWIGHT J. WEAVER agent of d/b/a D.W. Hardwoods Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
TATE v. PEOPLE'S UNITED FINANCIAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02030
Defendant:
PEOPLE'S UNITED FINANCIAL, INC., JERRY FRANKLIN, JANE CHWICK and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN TATE
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
THE CHOICE IS YOURS, INC. et al v. THE CHOICE IS YOURS et al
as 2:2014cv01804
Plaintiff:
THE CHOICE IS YOURS, INC. and JAMES SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
THE CHOICE IS YOURS, SETH WILLIAMS, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01272
Plaintiff:
OSCAR GILES, ARTIS HOUSTON, HORACE COPELAND and others
Defendant:
NFL PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C., NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL FILMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NELSON v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2010mc00184
Petitioner:
DWIGHT NELSON
Respondent:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.
as 2:2010cv03918
Plaintiff:
SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Defendant:
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
HUNDLEY v. HOLLOWAY et al
as 2:2010cv02150
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL DWIGHT HUNDLEY
Defendant:
JEANNEAN HOLLOWAY, TIMOTHY GIETHNER and PRESIDENT OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, PHILADELPHIA BRANCH, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
DETWILER v. DIEHL et al
as 3:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
TODD DETWILER
Defendant:
DWIGHT GUY DIEHL, SEAN M. BURKE, MCQUAIDE, BLASKO, SCHWARTZ, FLEMING & FAUKNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
