Cases 1 - 10 of 96
In Re Subpoena of Dependable Hawaiian Express, Inc.
as 2:2023mc00141
Plaintiff:
In Re Subpoena Issued to Dependable Hawaiian Express, Inc. in American President Lines, LLC v. Matson Navigation Company, Inc., et al., American President Lines, LLC, APL Martime, Ltd. and others
In Re:
Dependable Hawaiian Express, Inc.
Defendant:
Matson, Inc., Matson Navigation Company, Inc. and Matson Logistics, Inc.
In Re: Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Provincial Court of Zaragoza, Section Two, Spain, in ADICAE
as 3:2023mc80240
In Re:
In Re: Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Provincial Court of Zaragoza, Section Two, Spain, in ADICAE v. Luis Domingo Neyra Rambau, et al
Not Classified By Court:
Automattic, Inc.
Collier v. Trump et al
as 3:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
Irina Collier
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Governor of CA Newsome, Governor of FL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
In Re Ex Parte Application of Shueisha Inc. et al et al v. CloudFlare, Inc. et al
as 3:2023mc80162
Plaintiff:
In Re Ex Parte Application of Shueisha Inc. et al, Shueisha Inc., Shogakukan Inc. and others
Defendant:
CloudFlare, Inc. and Google LLC
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul, Republic of Korea In The Matter of Ahin Park v. Unknown et al.
as 5:2023mc80016
Plaintiff:
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul, Republic of Korea In The Matter of Ahin Park v. Unknown et al.
Petitioner:
United States of America
In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep EcoDiesel Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2017md02777
Defendant:
Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep EcoDiesel Marketing, Sales practices and products Liability Litigation, VM Motori S.p.A., Melvin McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Martha Maroon, Craig McCully, Ron Norman and others
Interested Party:
The People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Michael E Heygood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In Re Ex Parte Application of Shueisha Inc. et al v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2022mc80273
Plaintiff:
In Re Ex Parte Application of Shueisha Inc. et al, Shueisha Inc., Shogakukan Inc. and others
Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc., Mastercard International Incorporated, Google, LLC and others
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of California et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv04975
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Maine, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), Women Lawyers on Guard Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, Center for Public Representation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Caswell County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07038
Plaintiff:
Caswell County, North Carolina et al, CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA, DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
