Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Double Eagle Alloys, Inc. v. Hooper et al
as 4:2019cv00243
Defendant:
Michel Hooper, Ace Alloys, LLC and Michael Hooper
Plaintiff:
Double Eagle Alloys, Inc.
Garrett v. Tymkovech et al
as 4:2018cv00367
Defendant:
Monroe G McKay, Mary Briscoe, Gregory Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Shirley Dionne Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bowes et al v. American Eagle Outfitters Inc et al
as 5:2017cv01166
Plaintiff:
Brooke Bowes
Defendant:
American Eagle Outfitters Inc and AEO Management Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cummings et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corp. et al
as 5:2016cv00647
Plaintiff:
Alyece Cummings and Daniel Lapka
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corp , AMGS, L.L.C. , Carmen Acquisition, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Eagle View Technologies, Inc. v. Xactware Solutions, Inc.
as 4:2013mc00013
Plaintiff:
Eagle View Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Xactware Solutions, Inc.
Movant:
ConnectPoint Resolutions Systems, LLC
Porter Trust et al v. Rural Water Sewer and Solid Waste Management
as 5:2008cv00925
Plaintiff:
Porter Trust, Porter Trust, Gary Bower and others
Defendant:
Rural Water Sewer and Solid Waste Management and Rural Water Sewer and Solid Waste Management
Counter Claimant:
Rural Water Sewer and Solid Waste Management and Rural Water Sewer and Solid Waste Management
Counter Defendant:
Mark Gellenbeck, Mark Gellenbeck, Shawn Ingle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Amerifirst Funding, Inc. et al
as 6:2007mc00014
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Amerifirst Funding, Inc., Amerifirst Acceptance Corp., Jeffrey C. Bruteyn and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Amerifirst Funding, Inc. et al
as 4:2007mc00019
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Amerifirst Funding, Inc., Amerifirst Acceptance Corp., Jeffrey C Bruteyn and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
