Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Martinez v. City of Santa Maria, et al.
as 23-4277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEBAN MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, PHIL HANSEN, JESUS VALLE, No 19091 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Elizondo
as 23-50807
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Joel Garcia Elizondo, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Guerrero Elizondo v. Garland
as 23-243
Petitioner:
CESAR IVAN GUERRERO ELIZONDO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as MN/0:23-CV-02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Turnbull v. Board of Directors of the State Bar of Texas et al
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Edward Turnbull, IV
Defendant:
Board of Directors of the State Bar of Texas, Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Elizondo-Martinez
as 23-10015
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jesus Elizondo-Martinez
USA v. Elizondo-Martinez
as 23-10013
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jesus Elizondo-Martinez
In re Goldman Sachs Group, Inc
as 22-484
Plaintiff:
Pension Funds, Ilene Richman, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Pablo Elizondo and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Arkansas Teachers Retirement System, West Virginia Investment Management Board and Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Group
Defendant:
Sarah E. Smith
Defendant / Appellant:
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Lloyd C. Blankfein, David A. Viniar and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
