Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bittle v. North Carolina Division of Employment Security
as 3:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
North Carolina Division of Employment Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bailey Brothers AG Partnership
as 5:2016mc00005
Petitioner:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
Bailey Brothers AG Partnership
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Andys/Hwy 55 of Kenly
as 5:2015mc00101
Movant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
Andys/Hwy 55 of Kenly
Camden County et al v. Northeastern Community Development Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Camden County , East Carolina Behavioral Health and Pasquotank County
Defendant:
Northeastern Community Development Corporation, United States Department of Agriculture , United States Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Fuller v. Employment Security Commission
as 5:2012mc00072
Plaintiff:
Reginald D. Fuller
Defendant:
Employment Security Commission
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Jones
as 3:2012mc00158
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
Joyce Jones
FEDERAL INSURANCE CO. et al v. AL QAIDA, et al
as 1:2012mc00030
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL INSURANCE CO. , PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY, CHUBB CUSTOM INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
AL QAIDA, EGYPTIAN ISLAMIC JIHAD, ASBAT AL-ANSAR and others
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rel Cottage, Inc.
as 2:2011mc00001
Petitioner:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
Rel Cottage, Inc.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.
as 5:2008mc00001
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
