Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Ergon Refining v. EPA
as 23-60492
Petitioner:
Ergon Refining, Incorporated, Ergon-West Virginia, Incorporated and Placid Refining Company, L.L.C.
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Ergon Refining, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 23-1253
Petitioner:
Ergon Refining, Inc. and Ergon-West Virginia, Inc.
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
American Refining Group, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 23-1243
Petitioner:
American Refining Group, Inc., Calumet Montana Refining, LLC, Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. v. Regan
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Ergon-West Virginia, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael S. Regan
American Refining Group, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 22-1279
Petitioner:
American Refining Group, Inc., Calumet Montana Refining, LLC, Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
American Refining Group, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 22-1228
Petitioner:
American Refining Group, Inc., Calumet Montana Refining, LLC, Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Ergon Refining, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 22-1193
Petitioner:
Ergon Refining, Inc. and Ergon-West Virginia, Inc.
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Ergon Refining v. EPA
as 22-60433
Petitioner:
Ergon Refining, Incorporated and Ergon-West Virginia, Incorporated
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Ergon Refining, Inc. v. EPA
as 22-1131
Petitioner:
Ergon Refining, Inc.
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Growth Energy v. EPA, et al
as 22-1127
Petitioner:
Growth Energy
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator
Intervenor:
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Petroleum Institute, American Refining Group, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
