Cases 1 - 10 of 1,065
USA v. Marco Zamora-Estrada
as 24-11455
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARCO ZAMORA-ESTRADA
Estrada v. Alpha Lab Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03531
Plaintiff:
Nelson Estrada
Defendant:
Alpha Lab Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Aguilar Estrada v. Garland
as 24-2532
Petitioner:
ERASMO AGUILAR ESTRADA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rendon Acero et al v. USCIS et al
as 9:2024cv80480
Plaintiff:
Carolina Rendon Acero, Manuela Estrada Rendon, Mateo Estrada Rendon and others
Defendant:
USCIS, SECRETARY Alejandro MAYORKAS, Attorney Gen. MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Estrada-Castaneda v. Garland
as 24-2258
Petitioner:
ERIKA L. ESTRADA-CASTANEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Medina-Ventura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1651
Petitioner:
DORA ISABEL MEDINA-VENTURA and MIA KIMBERLY ESTRADA-MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jesus Eric Carasco v. E. Martin Estrada et al
as 8:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Jesus Eric Carasco
Defendant:
E. Martin Estrada and United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Lopez-Ordonez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1263
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO LOPEZ-ORDONEZ, JULIA ALICIA SAY-ESTRADA, DASHA GISSEL LOPEZ-SAY and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Estrada da Vida LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Estrada da Vida LLC doing business as The Cork House Wine Bar doing business as The Cork House and Xavier D. Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
