Cases 1 - 10 of 17
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 21-16347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, H. WICKHAM, Deputy Dir. of NDOC, COLLMAN, S C/O Mailroom Super and others
Defendant:
BRIAN SANDEVAL, ADAM LAXSULT, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Flamm v. Intel Corporation
as 21-1369
Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD., MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. and others
Appellant:
DANIEL L. FLAMM
Stanley Gleason v. Robert Neuschmid, et al
as 19-16830
Defendant / Appellee:
J. FLAMM, ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden, ROBERT W. FOX, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY GLEASON
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 19-16794
Defendant / Appellee:
HICK-MOSES, W. MILLER, Sgt., ADAM LAXSULT and others
Defendant:
JOHNS, Dr.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Flamm v. Intel Corporation
as 19-1744
Not Yet Classified:
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC. and INTEL CORPORATION
Appellant:
DANIEL L. FLAMM
Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Flamm v. Intel Corporation
as 19-1737
Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION, MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC. and others
Appellant:
DANIEL L. FLAMM
Flamm v. Intel Corporation
as 19-1740
Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION, MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC. and others
Appellant:
DANIEL L. FLAMM
Flamm v. Intel Corporation
as 19-1739
Not Yet Classified:
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC. and INTEL CORPORATION
Appellant:
DANIEL L. FLAMM
Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Clancy et al v. Vacationaire Estates, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv02249
Defendant:
Mr. Daniel Russ Elsey, Mr. Donald L. Flamm, Donald L. and Sandra S. Flamm Community Property Trust and others
Petitioner:
Mrs. Nicole L. Clancy
Plaintiff:
Clancy's on Island Lake Inc, Mr. Timothy J. Clancy, Nicole L. Clancy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
