Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United States of America v. Delvi (Sanchez)
as 23-7777
Defendant:
RICARDO DELVI, ANGEL CORDERO, RANSAIS A. GARCIA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
EDGAR MARINO SANCHEZ and Marinito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Bradin, et al v. Michael Carvajal, et al
as 21-5027
Respondent / Appellee:
Bureau of Prisons, Southern Center for Human Rights, Michael Carvajal, Director, Bureau of Prisons Central Office and others
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ross, Scott Howie, Gregory Greene and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
John Bradin
Frank Rodriguez-Dominguez v. William Barr
as 20-70822
Petitioner:
FRANK RODRIGUEZ-DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv07778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv07692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Frank Rodriguez v. Dr. Kroxton, et al
as 2:2017cv09231
Defendant:
Dr Kroxton, Dr Kroxton, J. Leiws and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Rodriguez
United States of America v. Delvi (Sanchez)
as 17-3871
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ricardo Delvi, AKA Benny, AKA Brain, Angel Cordero, AKA Pinky, Ransais A. Garcia, AKA Shorty and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Edgar Marino Sanchez, AKA Marinito
Central Produce Corp. v. 34-18 M&M Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv03841
Defendant:
34-18 M&M Corp., Frank's Caballito #2 Market Place, Inc. and Frank Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Central Produce Corp.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Rodriguez v. Holder
as 14-1262
Petitioner:
Frank Rodriguez, AKA Frank Rodrhuez-Cedeno
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Rivera et al
as 1:2013cv00687
Plaintiff:
Iris Rivera, Frank Rodriguez and Leamsi Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
