Cases 1 - 9 of 9
GIC PRIVATE LIMITED v. CELGENE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv16767
Plaintiff:
GIC PRIVATE LIMITED
Defendant:
CELGENE CORPORATION, SCOTT A. SMITH, TERRIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Axonic Capital LLC et al v. Gateway One Lending & Finance, LLC. et al
as 2:2018cv05127
Plaintiff:
Axonic Capital GP LLC, Axonic Capital LLC, Axonic Credit Opportunities Master Fund, LP and others
Defendant:
Gateway One Lending and Finance, LLC, TCF Auto Receivables Owner Trust 2014-1, TCF Auto Receivables Owner Trust 2015-1 and others
GIC Private Limited v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2018cv00463
Plaintiff:
GIC Private Limited
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
GIC PRIVATE LIMITED v. MERCK & CO., INC et al
as 2:2015cv00866
Plaintiff:
GIC PRIVATE LIMITED
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC, ALISE S. REICIN and EDWARD M. SCOLNICK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
GIC Private Limited v. BP plc et al
as 4:2014cv01072
Plaintiff:
GIC Private Limited
Defendant:
BP plc , BP America Inc. , BP Exploration & Production Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GIC PRIVATE LIMITED v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2014cv00241
Plaintiff:
GIC PRIVATE LIMITED
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. , MERCK/SCHERING-PLOUGH PHARMACEUTICALS , MSP DISTRIBUTION SERVICES (C) LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
GIC PRIVATE LIMITED v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2013cv07241
Plaintiff:
GIC PRIVATE LIMITED
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK/SCHERING-PLOUGH PHARMACEUTICALS, MSP DISTRIBUTION SERVICES (C) LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
GIC Private Limited v. American Int'l Group, Inc.
as 1:2013cv06565
Plaintiff:
GIC Private Limited
Defendant:
American Int'l Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
