Cases 1 - 10 of 469
Barnes v. State of California Eureka Administration, et al.
as 24-4871
Defendant:
JEFF BEZOS, Administrator UCC, LOS ANGELES COUNTY POLICE ACADEMY, EMILY J. COLE, The LA County Sheriff Dept and others
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE DANNY JONTE BARNES
Gonzalez, et al. v. Google Inc.
as 24-4837
Plaintiff:
JOSE HERNANDEZ, REY GONZALEZ, THE ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE INC.
In re: Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy
as 24-8029
Petitioner:
JOSE M. BERMUDEZ, LYNNE KRAUSE and NICHOLAS TODD HEINRICH
Respondent:
WPP PLC, GOOGLE INC, VIBRANT MEDIA INC and others
Unknown:
POINTROLL INC and In re: IN RE: GOOGLE INC. COOKIE PLACEMENT CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION
In Re: Request For International Judicial Assistance From The Incheon District Court, Republic Of Korea, In The Matter Of Eunyoung Kim V. Min Song
as 5:2024mc80174
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Adam John MacKintosh v. Tim Cook et al
as 2:2024cv05854
Defendant:
Marc Lewis, Lewis and Llewellyn, LLP, Arturo Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Adam John MacKintosh
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Baghirzade v. Armenian National Committee of America, et al
as 3:2024cv01077
Defendant:
Yelp, Inc., Los Angeles County Bar Association, Orange County Bar Association and others
Plaintiff:
Aynur Baghirzade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Haocheng v. YouTube Inc.
as 24-1116
Plaintiff:
HAOCHENG QIAN
Defendant:
YOUTUBE INC. and GOOGLE INC.
David Sifuentes, III v. Google, Inc.
as 24-1102
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III
Defendant:
GOOGLE, INC.
Raj PatelIn re: Raj Patel
as 24-1010
Petitioner:
In re: RAJ K. PATEL
Respondent:
ALPHABET INC, GOOGLE INC and MARYELLEN NOREIKA
Sifuentes v. Google Inc.
as 23-3839
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. SIFUENTES, III
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
