Cases 1 - 10 of 85
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. GJELI et al
as 2:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
LUAN GJELI, TIERA D. GORDON, TAUSHA D. MCDANIEL Individually, and as officers, directors, shareholders and/or principals of TD 7016 FRANKFORD INC d/b/a SPIKED LOUNGE and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
GORDON v. PASQUARELLO et al
as 2:2022cv01565
Plaintiff:
JASON GORDON
Defendant:
MICHAEL PASQUARELLO, JENNIPHUR PASQUARELLO, 1310-12 FRANKFORD AVE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
WHITFIELD v. ZYNGA, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
ZYNGA, INC., MARK PINCUS, FRANK GIBEAU and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
WHITFIELD v. HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00916
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT COMPANY, JOHN J LYNCH, JR., LAWRENCE K FISH and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
CICCOTELLI v. AEGION CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv01914
Defendant:
AEGION CORPORATION, WALTER J GALVIN, STEPHEN P CORTINOVIS and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
GOODEN v. WALTON et al
as 2:2021cv00190
Defendant:
AARON WALTON, EPCOT CRENSHAW, THOMAS S. MULLER and others
Plaintiff:
WARREN E. GOODEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parshall v. ABELIOVICH et al
as 2:2021cv00137
Plaintiff:
James Parshall
Defendant:
ASA ABELIOVICH, PETER THOMPSON, FRANCOIS NADER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARTZ v. BLAKEY et al
as 2:2020cv04290
Respondent:
PATRICIA MCNAMARA, PATRICIA MAISANO, JOSEPH MEOLA and others
Petitioner:
TRUSTEE EDWARD JAMES ARTZ
STEINKIRCHNER v. NAVIENT
as 2:2019cv01241
Plaintiff:
ANASTASIA STEINKIRCHNER
Defendant:
NAVIENT, NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, ERIC M. HURWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
