Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Washington v. United States Federal Government
as 3:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Bretz Washington
Defendant:
United States Federal Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
City of Huntington Beach et al v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 8:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
City of Huntington Beach, Huntington Beach City Council, Tony Strickland and others
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Gustavo Velasquez, State Legislature and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Frank Kaplan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu et al
as 3:2023cv04620
Defendant:
Thiruvenkatasamy, Senthilrajan, Pradeep Puli Rukmangatha Sairam Babu and others
Plaintiff:
Nagarajan Duraisamy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
East Yard Communities For Environmental Justice et al v. South Coast Air Quality Management District et al
as 2:2023cv06682
Plaintiff:
East Yard Communities For Environmental Justice, People's Collective for Environmental Justice, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
South Coast Air Quality Management District, The Governing Board of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, California Air Resources Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Friends of Newport Harbor v. City of Newport Beach et al
as 2:2023cv07504
Plaintiff:
Friends of Newport Harbor, a limited liability company and Friends of Newport Harbor
Defendant:
City of Newport Beach, a municipal corporation, Newport Beach City Council, governing body of the City of Newport Beach, DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Central Valley Air Quality Coalition, et al. v. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, et al.
as 1:2023cv00794
Plaintiff:
Central Valley Air Quality Coalition, Committee for a Better Arvin, Committee for a Better Shafter and others
Defendant:
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District and Governing Board of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
AMI - Government Employees Provident Fund Management Company Ltd. v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
AMI - Government Employees Provident Fund Management Company Ltd.
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Sundar Pichai, Ruth M. Porat and others
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Central CA Environmental Justice Network et al v. Randolph et al
as 2:2022cv01714
Plaintiff:
Central California Environmental Justice Network, Committee for a Better Arvin, Medical Advocates for Healthy Air and others
Defendant:
Liane Randolph, Steven Cliff, Sandra Berg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
The Regents of the University of California v. Government Employees Health Association, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California, on behalf of University of California, Irvine Medical Center and The Regents of the University of California
Defendant:
Government Employees Health Association, Inc. and DOES 1-25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
