Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Howard et al v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2024cv08095
Plaintiff:
Marie Howard, Richard Shorty and Lilly Wilson
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Miller v. Juarez Cartel et al
as 2:2023mc00039
Defendant:
Juarez Cartel, Fuente Organization, Vincente Carillo and others
Plaintiff:
Howard J Miller
Howard v. Republican National Committee et al
as 2:2023cv00993
Plaintiff:
Jacob Howard
Defendant:
Republican National Committee and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Shurwest LLC v. Howard
as 2:2020mc00057
Defendant:
Carolyn Howard
Plaintiff:
Shurwest LLC
Petitioner:
Quantum Group USA LLC and Tony Avalos
Bruno v. Sherman & Howard LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00361
Plaintiff:
P Leonard Bruno
Defendant:
Sherman & Howard LLC , Schoenberg Family Law Group PLC , Professional Beauty Association and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Gila River Indian Community v. Fourth Pioneer LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00626
Plaintiff:
Gila River Indian Community
Defendant:
Fourth Pioneer LLC, Freeport Minerals Corporation, Freeport-McMoran Safford Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Howard v. Wakefield & Associates Incorporated
as 4:2017cv00245
Plaintiff:
Tommy Howard
Defendant:
Wakefield & Associates Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nohr v. Jang et al
as 2:2017mc00002
Plaintiff:
Jason L Nohr
Defendant:
Corinna Jang, Chris Litsey, Patrick Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
