Cases 1 - 10 of 184
Stryker Corporation, et al v. XL Insurance America
as 21-2863
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STRYKER CORPORATION and HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant:
XL INSURANCE AMERICA
DT Consultants, LLC v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 21-1866
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DT CONSULTANTS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION, d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics
Defendant:
STRYKER CORPORATION
DT Consultants, LLC v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 21-1854
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DT CONSULTANTS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION, d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics and STRYKER CORPORATION
Christopher Ridgeway v. Stryker Corporation, et al
as 19-30791
Appellee:
STRYKER CORPORATION and HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MARTIN RIDGEWAY
Godfrey et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as FLS/2:18-14033-00000
Plaintiff:
Linda Godfrey and Joe Godfrey
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation
Emmett v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as KYW/3:17-cv-00519
Plaintiff:
Jay F. Emmett
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation
LUSH v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION
as DC/1:17-cv-01578
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LUSH
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION , STRYKER CORPORATION and STRYKER IRELAND LIMITED
Bolduc v. Stryker Corporation et al
as RI/1:17-cv-00429
Plaintiff:
Phillippe J. Bolduc
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
KOLBOSKY v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION et al
as PAW/2:17-cv-01263
Plaintiff:
LOIS KOLBOSKY
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION , STRYKER CORPORATION and STRYKER SALES CORPORATION
Cote v. Stryker Corporation et al
as RI/1:17-cv-00311
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cote
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
