Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harvinder Singh v. William Barr
as 20-3604
Petitioner:
HARVINDER SINGH
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Harvinder Singh v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-72373
Petitioner:
HARVINDER SINGH
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Harvinder Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72048
Petitioner:
HARVINDER SINGH
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Kambala et al v. Signal International LLC et al
as TXE/1:13-cv-00498
Plaintiff:
Srinivasa Rao Kambala , Srinivasa Rao Gonna , Amandeep Singh Kang and others
Defendant:
Signal International, LLC , Signal International, Inc. , Signal International Texas, G.P. and others
Singh et al v. Bhatia et al
as 4:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
Kanwaljit Singh , Jarnail Singh , Harjit Singh and others
Defendant:
Sardar Gurmit Bhatia, Sardar Rupinder Singh, Members of Management Committee of Sikh Center Houston of Gulf Coast Area, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Harvinder Singh , Sampuran Singh , Bhupinder Singh and others
Intervenor_defendant:
S. Kamaljit Singh Mann , S. Mukhtiar Singh , S. Kashmir Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dennis Lancaster v. U.P. Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2012mc00406
Defendant:
Harvinder Singh Binning and U.P. Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lancaster
Singh et al v. Melville et al
as 1:2008cv00430
Plaintiff:
Avtar Singh, Harvinder Singh and Gurjeet Kaur
Defendant:
Rosemary Melville and Emilio T. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Singh et al v. Melville et al
as 3:2007cv06011
Plaintiff:
Avtar Singh, Harvinder Singh and Gurjeet Kaur
Defendant:
Rosemary Melville and Emilio T. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Singh v. Melville
as 4:2007cv03746
Plaintiff:
Harvinder Singh
Defendant:
Rosemary Melville
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
