Cases 1 - 10 of 411
Tjalas et al v. Ruark et al
as 2:2024cv01641
Plaintiff:
Kirk Tjalas, Act Now Health Care Solutions LLC, Act Now Management LLC and others
Defendant:
Jamin Reese Ruark, Haven EEOI Holdings LLC, Kristi Lyn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hudson Shore Associates Limited Partnership v. State of New York
as 24-1678
Plaintiff:
HUDSON SHORE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, HAVEN ON THE HUDSON LLC, KENNETH LEVINSON and others
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL, VILLAGE OF NYACK, New York and others
Flynn v. Verizon Wireless
as 24-1562
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. FLYNN, XIII, JOHN DOES, 1, PHIL MARIE and others
Defendant:
VERIZON WIRELESS, Ct Corporation System, BOB DUFF, THEMIS KLARIDES and others
One Barberry Real Estate Holding, LLC v. Maturo
as 24-1480
Plaintiff:
ONE BARBERRY REAL ESTATE HOLDING, LLC, FARM RIVER ROCK, LLC and JOHN PATTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH MATURO, JR., CHRISTOPHER SOTO, MICHAEL MILICI and others
Barry v. LaManna
as 24-1272
Petitioner:
MAMADOU BARRY
Respondent:
Superintendant LAMANNA, Green Haven Correctional Facility
Osorio v. Supt. Johnson
as 24-1206
Petitioner:
WIGBERTO OSORIO
Respondent:
Supt. JOHNSON, Green Haven Correctional Fac.
Horn v. New Haven
as 24-1034
Plaintiff:
VERNON HORN
Defendant:
PETISIA ADGER, in their individual capacities, LEE DEASE, Executor of the Estate of Leroy Dease, DARYLE BRELAND, in their individual capacities and others
Jackson v. New Haven
as 24-1038
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS JACKSON
Defendant:
PETISIA ADGER, in their individual capacities, DARYLE BRELAND, in their individual capacities, LEE DEASE, Executor of the Estate of Leroy Dease and others
Davis v. Royce
as 24-863
Petitioner:
LASHAWAN DAVIS
Defendant:
MARK ROYCE, Superintendent of Green Haven Correctinoal Facility
Nunes v. Johnson
as 24-766
Petitioner:
CARLSON NUNES
Respondent:
JAMES JOHNSON, Supt; Green Haven Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
